ABSTRACT
Background: Regional anesthesia is the common anesthetic procedure for patients undergoing lower abdomen and lower extremity surgery. Anesthesia-personnel should be aware of the common complications for patient safety.Objective: To survey anesthesia-personnel’s knowledge of complications from regional anesthesia.Design: Descriptive studySetting: Srinagarind Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine.Population: 51 anesthesia-personnel : 39 nurse- anesthetists and 12 residents.Methods: Anesthesia-personnel answered the questionnaire (13 items, created by the research team) during a one-hour classroom period. The answer sheets were analyzed for difficulty index (“p”), and the discrimination index (“r”). The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.Results: Fifty anesthesia-personnel answered the questionnaire: 39 nurse - anesthetists (78.00%) and 11 residents (22.00%). Respondents averaged 36.18 ± 7.23 years of age and 7.70 ± 6.26 years of experience in anesthesia. We found that the anesthesia-personnel had averaged 80.31%(or had a good level of knowledge). Age and years of experience did not correlate with the level of knowledge. Residents scored significantly higher than nurse-anesthetists (88.08 vs. 78.08%, respectively)(p=0.01). Conclusion: The knowledge of complications from regional anesthesia was of a good level among anesthesia-personnel practising at Srinagarind Hospital.
ABSTRACT
Background: Nursing care in the orthopedic surgical wards have in place a policy for quality improvement, which is emphasized by use of pain score recording.Objective: To audit pain score records for the first 72 hours after surgeryDesign: Descriptive study with retrospective data collectionSetting: Orthopedic Surgical Wards at Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen University, ThailandMethods: Between March and April 2005, we extracted data from the Graphic Sheets for patients ³ 10 years of age.Outcome Measures: 1) All records were audited and the values for pain scores recorded each day including the operative day (Day 0 – assessed by a nurse every 4 hours) and two days post-op (Days 1 and 2 – assessed every 8 hours). Good quality records had regularly recorded pain scores. An improvement in quality was acknowledged if the proportion of quality records was ³80%. 2) The percentage of patients having two-consecutive severe pain recordings (i.e. score ³ 7) on each Day. 3) Mean pain score each time. 4) Patient-satisfaction before discharge.Results: A total of 94 patients were included. On Day 0, 98% of the assessment and recording of pain scores occurred, on Day 1 it was 95% and on Day 2 it was 89%. The highest post-operative pain was 5.5 ± 2.5, 4.0 ± 2.5 and 3.1 ± 2.7 on Day 0, 1 and 2; while the lowest pain score was 4.2 ± 2.8, 2.9 ± 2.7 and 2.1 ± 2.1 on Day 0, 1 and 2, respectively. Percentages of the patients having two-consecutive severe pain were 19%, 5% and 1%, respectively. All of the patients were satisfied with the pain relief offered.Conclusion: Completion of the assessment and pain score records at the orthopedic surgical wards were high and all of the patients indicated that they were satisfied with the pain service.Keywords: Audit Recording, Orthopedic Wards, Pain Scores, Postoperative